Open your mind
David Hand explains the pitfalls of analyzing imperfect data sets.No one can access all the facts, because it data is missing, hidden or change over time. Jumping to conclusions can be hazardous.
Good book to understand statistics
I listened to the audiobook and found it interesting. I just got the book. So, I am going to read it for understanding. I think there is lot to absorb.
A book that didnât need to be written
This is not a bad book: it does not deliver misinformation, it is not poorly written and it provides plenty of historical examples of situations where data was in fact missing. But thatâs about it…itâs kind of like if you opened Wikipedia to a totally random page, and then just kept clicking from one link to another for 300 pages. âHere is a situation in history where they didnât have 100% of available data. And hereâs another one. And hereâs one over here. Fast forward 100 years and hereâs a case where they didnât have all of the data. Rewind 50 years and hereâs another example. Hereâs an example in the medical field, and hereâs one in physics.â The end (no conclusions were drawn in the writing of this book).
Upset about the quality of the new book
This book isn’t as bad as the last, but seriously, handle with better care! It’s too close to Christmas to exchange them and that’s extremely upsetting!
Professor David Hand is a major statistician who writes useful and interesting books for audiences from the general public up to the graduate statistician expert. He write clearly and gives lots of interestim examples. This book provokes the statistical practitioner to think about the data she is *not* seeing, as a way of not falling into certain kinds of error. Very useful and interesting.
Open your mind
David Hand explains the pitfalls of analyzing imperfect data sets.No one can access all the facts, because it data is missing, hidden or change over time. Jumping to conclusions can be hazardous.
Good book to understand statistics
I listened to the audiobook and found it interesting. I just got the book. So, I am going to read it for understanding. I think there is lot to absorb.
A book that didnât need to be written
This is not a bad book: it does not deliver misinformation, it is not poorly written and it provides plenty of historical examples of situations where data was in fact missing. But thatâs about it…itâs kind of like if you opened Wikipedia to a totally random page, and then just kept clicking from one link to another for 300 pages. âHere is a situation in history where they didnât have 100% of available data. And hereâs another one. And hereâs one over here. Fast forward 100 years and hereâs a case where they didnât have all of the data. Rewind 50 years and hereâs another example. Hereâs an example in the medical field, and hereâs one in physics.â The end (no conclusions were drawn in the writing of this book).
Upset about the quality of the new book
This book isn’t as bad as the last, but seriously, handle with better care! It’s too close to Christmas to exchange them and that’s extremely upsetting!
OK
Im currently embarking on a research masters using secondarh data. This text was an eye opener
Professor David Hand is a major statistician who writes useful and interesting books for audiences from the general public up to the graduate statistician expert. He write clearly and gives lots of interestim examples. This book provokes the statistical practitioner to think about the data she is *not* seeing, as a way of not falling into certain kinds of error. Very useful and interesting.