Sale!
Original price was: 1.699,00 EGP.1.199,00 EGPCurrent price is: 1.199,00 EGP.
Description
Price: [price_with_discount]
(as of [price_update_date] – Details)
[ad_1]
Customers say
Customers find the book engaging and insightful, providing a great overview of computer culture. They praise the writing style as interesting, accessible, and written in plain English. Many describe it as a quick, easy read with analogies. However, some readers feel the book has dated content and lacks historical completeness. Opinions vary on the historical accuracy – some find it good and useful, while others consider it weak or out of touch.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
[ad_2]
Smart perspective in plain english…
This book is an excellent and plain-spoken commentary on both the OS wars and the direction media and technology are driving world culture. While other reviews have complained that some topics are inadequately covered, for example the Be operating system, they are missing the point that this is neither a review of Be for the uninitiated, nor a some kind of technical manual. People looking for that should stick to PCWEEK and O’Reilly This book distills a lot of perspective in a few short chapters. For those who are willing to accept Stephenson’s arguments without a lot of direct evidence this is an insanely useful book. Of course, if you don’t believe him, you can test his conclusions just by running four or five computers in your home with the various OSes installed. More important than his commentaries on the relative merits of the OS are his fun yet chilling thoughts in chapters like THE INTERFACE CULTURE where he discusses Disneyland and our love for mediated experience. This is the same territory investigated by semiotician Umberto Eco in his book Travels in Hyperreality but Stephenson is more lucid & terse, and does not bog himself down with theoretical constructs.This book is worth any four college texts in critical theory and should be read by MBA’s as well as anybody working with the media. Don’t discount it just because it feels like light reading and more the journalistic essay than the scholarly dissertation.
Not for everyone but well worth reading if you like going for deep dives
In the Beginning…Was the Command LineOriginally published in 1999, Neal’s essay on operating systems is, like most of his writing, multilayered and filled with palatable prose and a thought provoking potpourri of information that, especially in the case of this essay in book form, often requires rereading for proper digestion.Neal has a lot to say in Command Line.First and foremost, I walked away with the following impression: in the world of Neal, Windows is a necessary but doomed operating system. Neal explains why as only he can. He also tells you why Apple is doomed and Microsoft might be. Furthermore, Neal explains that there are better operating systems available and makes a case for why you might want to try them out: they are free, and they don’t crash. These two operating systems are Linux, which is a variant of UNIX and BeOS, which is the product of a mad Frenchman but which has many merits that outweigh the product’s French origins.Command Line is filled with memorable statements that sometimes border on or are in all actuality, profound.For instance – “Contemporary culture is a two-tiered system, like the Morlocks and the Eloi in H.G. Wells The Time Machine, except it has been turned upside down. In The Time Machine, the Eloi were an effete upper class supported by lots of subterranean Morlocks who kept the technological wheels turning. But in our world, it’s the other way round. The Morlocks are in the minority, and they are running the show, because they understand how everything works. The much more numerous Eloi learn everything they know from being steeped from birth in electronic media directed and controlled by book-reading Morlocks. That many ignorant people could be dangerous if they got pointed in the wrong direction, and so we’ve evolved a popular culture that is (a) almost unbelievably infectious, and (b) neuters every person who get infected by it, by rendering them unwilling to make judgments and incapable of taking stands.”In other words, Neal is saying, there are the people who read the book and there are the people who only watch the movie that is made about the book, and the people who read the book are the people who really know what the author was saying. The people who watch the movie don’t really get it, because they get the filtered version, the dumbed down version, the version built for mass consumption by those who are less intelligent or perhaps just not as focused.Command Line isn’t for everyone. It’s for Morlocks, or those who want to be Morlocks. If you’ve never owned a pocket protector, opened your computer case up or tinkered with the innards of any of the plethora of electronic devices you own, then you probably won’t consume this book with relish, as I did.Now, if you’ve stuck with my review to this paragraph, you likely are the type who will enjoy Command Line. Most importantly, you are, in all probability, the type to ponder on and eventually benefit from Neal’s closing, in which he compares God to an engineer and remind his readers that, “if you don’t like having your choices made for you, you should start making your own.”I came away from reading Command Line thoroughly convinced that I need to explore BeOS when I return from the war I’m currently fighting. And of course, I will continue making my own choices whenever possible, rather than letting others make them for me.Update: Since I wrote the review I’ve been talking to people and reading Neal’s web site. Two things are apparent to me: a) the book is very dated and b) Macintosh made the very smart decision to move their OS to a UNIX based product. This book will still be a highly enjoyable read if you have the soul of a nerd, as I do.
missing history, strange conclusions
I’m a professional programmer and an avid Linux owner. I’m always happy when someone throws a little barb at Microsoft or Apple. That having been said, I think this book generates more heat than light when it comes to the “OS War.” It’s somewhat weak on history, and a bit out of touch with what the average computer user wants. A glaring omission is the early history of Stephenson’s beloved Unix. To hear him tell it, Unix begins with Richard Stallman and Linus Torvalds. Now, to be sure these two are giants whose shoulders we stand upon, but where is the story of Unix’s actual invention at AT&T in the early 70s? The word “AT&T” appears only once in the book, briefly cited as something that Stallman was reacting against. The dark side of Unix’s corporate past – the fact that Unix originally was a proprietary operating system under AT&T, and that AT&T completely missed the point of Unix and sold the license to Novell, who also blew it – would have fit right in with Stephenson’s argument. Basically, for Stephenson, Unix IS Linux. There is no description whatsoever of the rich Unix tradition that precedes the founding of the Free Software Foundation, nor of the contributions that commercial Unixes like SunOS and Solaris have made, such as NFS, NIS, etc., nor of academic contributions like BSD or X. Stephenson lauds XWindows but makes it seem as if it too were a product of his open-source, hacker utopia – and not of the MIT X Consortium. These traditions were direct antecedents of today’s hacker community, and Stephenson gives them short shrift. Finally, there is Stephenson smugly chiding us on how GUIs make us into sheep led by a corporate shepherd. But he undermines his own argument by detailing (pretty factually) the time and sweat of installing and using Linux. So we are supposed to like this better than Microsoft? For the uninitiated, it sucks just as much – maybe more! If you are a programmer and a professional, Linux/Unix is the best route to go down. For the rest, people want something that turns on quickly, that doesn’t wreck their stuff, and is easy to use. Windows isn’t that – but neither is Linux. Stephenson is missing out on the real story: the imminent destruction of the personal computer as we know it. Someday very soon, small, highly-networked, specialized devices will replace the generalized, complicated computer. People will only pay for what they need. And what they get will be appliances, things that require neither a $95 per call help line (Microsoft) nor a descent into the depths of hacker message boards (Linux), to fix. Something like a TV set. Probably Linux or its descendant will be the operating system that these things will run on, but most people besides programmers won’t need to care. It’s a fun ride, and you’ll certainly finish knowing more than you did when you started. If I had to do it over, I’d buy and read this book again. But there is much more than this.
Genial. Un clasico.
The book is a really well written in-depth look at the way we see a computer. The author takes the case of the Personal Computer and the history behind OSeses like BEoS, PCDOS, MS Dos and Windows. It can be considered obsolete and out of date if you do not really pay attention to what a computer is and what it is not. It is actually universal if you take a step back and see down the line on how things can be or could have been. The chapter about the GUI was a good analysis about what our PCs might have been today if people were more thorough about making a decision based on something else than just mere looks. Overall this book is easy to read and while it gets theoretically detailed about notions that most of computer users have forgotten or will never need to know, it is really interesting and never a bore.
“In the Beginning was the Command Line” ist ein kompaktes Essay, in dem sich Neal Stephenson auf SEHR ironische Weise mit der Geschichte von Betriebsystemen auseinandersetzt: Ohne Wissen der meisten Benutzer tobt schon seit Jahren ein Kampf zwischen zwei ganz unterschiedlichen Bedienkonzepten.Auf der einen Seite: Die Verfechter der grafischen Benutzeroberflächen (Buttons, Menüs, Regler usw.). Alles soll möglichst “schön” aussehen und Einsteiger animieren.Auf der anderen Seite: Die Puristen. Die Programmierer. Sie bevorzugen die direkte Kontrolle über den Computer, eben die Kommandozeile.Mit diesem Gegensatz als Aufmacher führt Stephenson den Leser nicht nur in die Funktionsweise von Betriebsystemen ein (was auch für einige Lacher sorgt; lassen Sie sich von den “Auto”-Metaphern überraschen, die in keinem Buch über EDV fehlen dürfen), sondern spannt sogar noch den Bogen für (ein wenig) Kritik an der westlichen Konsumgesellschaft (“Morlocks” vs. “Eloi”).In einem Wort: Herrlich.[Das Buch kann auch von weniger technisch veranlagten Lesern verstanden werden; jene sind sogar meines Erachtens die Zielgruppe, denn Stephenson möchte nicht zuletzt auch erläutern, wie sich unser Umgang mit dem Computer verändert hat.]
This is an excellent book, a very entertaining and worthwhile read if you are at all interested in modern computer operating systems.However, like all computer science books, the technological aspect of it has already dated considerably, reducing its relevance as a survey. This is of course inevitable in such a fast-moving field. I would be very interested to read an updated edition taking into account the current situation in the OS marketplace.Stephenson primarily contrasts Windows(tm), Linux, MacOS and BeOS. Out of these systems, BeOS is basically dead, MacOS has undergone a sea change (to a considerable extent building on BeOS and Linux), Linux has grown in sophistication and user-friendliness, and Windows is… still basically Windows with some extra knobs on it.The book should not be ignored, though. The fundamental issue Stephenson comments on – whether it’s possible to control complex equipment through simplified interfaces -Â is never going to disappear. It’s also an entertaining read simply for the author’s wonderful use of language.
In this little book (whose length is more befitting of an essay), Neal Stephenson displays an impressive depth of technical knowledge about how computers work, particularly in the area of user interfaces: the means by which we make them do the things we want. He uses that as a jumping-off point to tease out the differences between typing commands and manipulating objects on a screen, and what that means for how we think about what we’re doing. It’s a characteristically stimulating collection of ideas – thus, at one point, he suggests an analogy between a graphical user interface (GUI) and Disney World: both “are in the same business: short-circuiting laborious, explicit verbal communication with expensively designed interfaces.” He’s concerned that an overuse of a GUI leads us into an unfamiliarity with the written word – in roughly the same way, I imagine, that a commentator of fifty years ago would contend that watching too much television leaves less time for reading books, and hence increasing levels of illiteracy.It’s an interesting observation, even if the technological examples he uses have inevitably become dated since the book was first published in 1999. This of course is an inevitable consequence of writing about the current state of a fast-moving technical landscape (for example, he says his favourite user interface is BeOS, whose development company was to be dissolved two years after this book came out). But the ideas contained in the book are stimulating enough to have persisted for longer than the technology, and there’s been at least one attempt (not written by the original author) to update its examples and observations. One of the reasons this has been possible is that the text is apparently freely available on the net. But it’s still nice to have the book.